Paper detail

Implications of bias evolution on measurements of the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect: errors and biases in parameter estimation

The subject of this paper is a quantification of the impact of uncertainties in bias and bias evolution on the interpretation of measurements of the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect, in particular on the estimation of cosmological parameters. We carry out a Fisher-matrix analysis for quantifying the degeneracies between the parameters of a dark energy cosmology and bias evolution, for the combination of the PLANCK microwave sky survey with the EUCLID main galaxy sample, where bias evolution b(a)=b_0+(1-a)b_a is modelled with two parameters b_0 and b_a. Using a realistic bias model introduces a characteristic suppression of the iSW-spectrum on large angular scales, due to the altered distance-weighting functions. The errors in estimating cosmological parameters if the data with evolving bias is interpreted in the framework of cosmologies with constant bias is quantified in an extended Fisher-formalism. We find that the best-fit values of all parameters are shifted by an amount comparable to the statistical accuracy: The estimation bias in units of the statistical accuracy amounts to 1.19 for Omega_m, 0.27 for sigma_8, and 0.72 for w for bias evolution with b_a=1. Leaving b_a open as a free parameter deteriorates the statistical accuracy, in particular on Omega_m and w.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.