Paper detail

Implication of the discovery of the proper motion of the optical counterpart of GRB 970228 for the models of gamma-ray bursts

The accurate position determination of GRB 970228 by the Beppo/SAX Satellite led to the discovery of a fading X-ray and optical counterparts of the burst. About a month after the GRB event the proper motion of the ejecta was detected and the extended optical source has faded below the Keck detection level. We analyze these observations in the framework of the most popular gamma ray burst models. We find a lower limit on the distance to GRB 970228 d>6.6 pc. We estimate the amount of energy required to explain the motion of a point source and the variability of the extended source. We find that the cosmological models are ruled out. The Galactic corona models suffer difficulties if the distance to the burst is > 100 kpc or the variability of the extended source is directly connected with the burst No constraints are found for GRBs originating between 6.6 pc and $\sim 10$ kpc.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.