Paper detail

Implementation of the ADMM to Parabolic Optimal Control Problems with Control Constraints and Beyond

Parabolic optimal control problems with control constraints are generally challenging, from either theoretical analysis or algorithmic design perspectives. Conceptually, the well-known alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) can be directly applied to such a problem. An attractive advantage of this direct ADMM application is that the control constraint can be untied from the parabolic PDE constraint; these two inherently different constraints thus can be treated individually in iterations. At each iteration of the ADMM, the main computation is for solving an unconstrained parabolic optimal control problem. Because of its high dimensionality after discretization, the unconstrained parabolic optimal control problem at each iteration can be solved only inexactly by implementing certain numerical scheme internally and thus a two-layer nested iterative scheme is required. It then becomes important to find an easily implementable and efficient inexactness criterion to execute the internal iterations, and to prove the overall convergence rigorously for the resulting two-layer nested iterative scheme. To implement the ADMM efficiently, we propose an inexactness criterion that is independent of the mesh size of the involved discretization, and it can be executed automatically with no need to set empirically perceived constant accuracy a prior. The inexactness criterion turns out to allow us to solve the resulting unconstrained optimal control problems to medium or even low accuracy and thus saves computation significantly, yet convergence of the overall two-layer nested iterative scheme can be still guaranteed rigorously. Efficiency of this ADMM implementation is promisingly validated by preliminary numerical results. Our methodology can also be extended to a range of optimal control problems constrained by other linear PDEs such as elliptic equations and hyperbolic equations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.