Paper detail

Implementation of annihilation and junction reactions in vector density-based continuum dislocation dynamics

In a continuum dislocation dynamics formulation by Xia and El-Azab, dislocations are represented by a set of vector density fields, one per crystallographic slip systems. The space-time evolution of these densities is obtained by solving a set of dislocation transport equations coupled with crystal mechanics. Here, we present an approach for incorporating dislocation annihilation and junction reactions into the dislocation transport equations. These reactions consume dislocations and result in nothing as in the annihilation reactions, or produce new dislocations of different types as in the case of junction reactions. Collinear annihilation, glissile junctions, and sessile junctions are particularly emphasized here. A generalized energy-based criterion for junction reactions is established in terms of the dislocation density and Burgers vectors of the reacting species, and the reaction rate terms for junction reactions are formulated in terms of the dislocation densities. In order to illustrate how the dislocation network changes as a result of junction formation and annihilation in a continuum dislocation dynamics setting, we present some numerical examples focusing on the reactions processes themselves. The results show that our modeling approach is able to capture the respective dislocation network changes associated with dislocation reactions in FCC crystals: dislocations of opposite line directions encountering each other on collinear slip systems annihilate to connect the dislocations on the two slip systems, glissile junctions form on new slip system behave like Frank-Read sources, and sessile junctions form and expand along the intersection of the slip planes of the reacting dislocation species. A collective-dynamics test showing the frequency of occurrence of junctions of different types relative to each other is also presented.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.