Paper detail

Implementation of a goodness-of-fit test for finding optimal concurrent radio and γ-ray pulsar light curves

Since the launch of the Fermi Large Area Telescope in 2008 the number of known $γ$-ray pulsars has increased immensely to over 200, many of which are also visible in the radio and X-ray bands. Seyffert et al. (2011) demonstrated how constraints on the viewing geometries of some of these pulsars could be obtained by comparing their observed radio and $γ$-ray light curves by eye to light curves from geometric models. While these constraints compare reasonably well with those yielded by more rigorous single-wavelength approaches, they are still a somewhat subjective representation of how well the models reproduce the observed radio and $γ$-ray light curves. Constructing a more rigorous approach is, however, made difficult by the large uncertainties associated with the $γ$-ray light curves as compared to those associated with the radio light curves. Naively applying a $χ^{2}$-like goodness-of-fit test to both bands invariably results in constraints dictated by the radio light curves. A number of approaches have been proposed to address this issue. In this paper we investigate these approaches and evaluate the results they yield. Based on what we learn, we implement our own version of a goodness-of-fit test, which we then use to investigate the behaviour of the geometric models in multi-dimensional phase space.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.