Paper detail

Implementation of a generalized precession parameter in the RIFT parameter estimation algorithm

Since the initial discovery of gravitational waves in 2015, significant developments have been made towards waveform interpretation and estimation of compact binary source parameters. We present herein an implementation of the generalized precession parameter $\langle χ_p \rangle$, which averages over all angular variations on the precession timescale, within the RIFT parameter estimation framework. Relative to the originally-proposed precession parameter $χ_p$, which characterizes the single largest dynamical spin in a binary, this new parameter $\langle χ_p \rangle$ has a unique domain $1 < \langle χ_p \rangle < 2$, which is exclusive to binaries with two precessing spins. After reviewing the physical differences between these two parameters, we describe how $\langle χ_p \rangle$ was implemented in RIFT and apply it to all 36 events from the second half of the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo third operating run (O3b). In O3b, ten events show significant amounts of precession $\langle χ_p \rangle > 0.5$. Of particular interest is GW191109_010717; we show it has a $\sim28\%$ probability that the originating system necessarily contains two misaligned spins.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.