Paper detail

Imperfect Secrecy in Wiretap Channel II

In a point-to-point communication system which consists of a sender, a receiver and a set of noiseless channels, the sender wishes to transmit a private message to the receiver through the channels which may be eavesdropped by a wiretapper. The set of wiretap sets is arbitrary. The wiretapper can access any one but not more than one wiretap set. From each wiretap set, the wiretapper can obtain some partial information about the private message which is measured by the equivocation of the message given the symbols obtained by the wiretapper. The security strategy is to encode the message with some random key at the sender. Only the message is required to be recovered at the receiver. Under this setting, we define an achievable rate tuple consisting of the size of the message, the size of the key, and the equivocation for each wiretap set. We first prove a tight rate region when both the message and the key are required to be recovered at the receiver. Then we extend the result to the general case when only the message is required to be recovered at the receiver. Moreover, we show that even if stochastic encoding is employed at the sender, the message rate cannot be increased.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.