Paper detail

Impacts on searching for signatures of new physics from $K^+ \to π^+ ν\barν$ decay

We study impacts on new physics search from the rare decay $K^+ \to π^+ ν\barν$. In a certain class of new physics models, the extra contributions to FCNC processes can be parametrized by its ratio to the standard model (SM) contribution with the common CKM factors. The ratio $R_1$ has been used in the analysis of $\xd$ and $ε_K$ parameters. In the above class of models, the $K^+ \to π^+ ν\barν$ decay amplitude can be parametrized by the ratio $R_2$. Then the experimentally allowed region for new physics contributions can be given in terms of $R_1,R_2$ and the CP violating phase $δ$ of the CKM matrix. Constraints on $R_1$ and $\cosd$ are obtained by taking account of current experimental data and theoretical uncertainties on $\bbbar$ and $\kkbar$ mixings. We study impacts of future improved measurements by using $(R_1, R_2, \cosd)$ basis. We discuss contributions in the minimal supersymmetric SM and the two Higgs doublet model as examples.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.