Paper detail

Impactor Flux and Cratering on the Pluto-Charon System

We study the impactor flux and cratering on Pluto and Charon due to the collisional evolution of Plutinos. Plutinos are those trans-Neptunian objects located at 39.5 AU, in the 3:2 mean motion resonance with Neptune. To do this, we develop a statistical code that includes catastrophic collisions and cratering events, and takes into account the stability and instability zones of the 3:2 mean motion resonance with Neptune. We proposes different initial populations that account for the uncertainty in the size distribution of Plutinos at small sizes. Depending on the initial population, our results indicate the following. The number of D > 1 km Plutinos streaking Pluto over 3.5 Gyr is between 1271 and 5552. For Charon, the number of D > 1 km Plutino impactors is between 354 and 1545. The number of D > 1 km craters on Pluto produced by Plutinos during the last 3.5 Gyr is between 43076 and 113879. For Charon, the number of D > 1 km craters is between 20351 and 50688.The largest Plutino impactor onto Pluto has a diameter between 17 and 23 km, which produces a craterwith a diameter of 31 - 39 km. The largest Plutino impactor onto Charon has a diameter between 10 and 15 km, which produces a crater with a diameter of 24 - 33 km. We test if 2 Pluto-sized objects are assumed in the 3:2 Neptune resonance, then the total number of Plutino impactors both onto Pluto as Charon with diameters D > 1 km is a factor of 1.6 - 1.8 larger if considering 1 Pluto-sized object. Given the dynamical structure of the trans-Neptunian region, it is necessary to study in detail the contribution of all the potential sources of impactors on the Pluto-Charon system, to obtain the main contributor and the whole production of craters. Then, we will be able to contrast those studies with observations which will help us to understand the geological processes and history of the surface of those worlds.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.