Paper detail

Impact of Variable Photospheric Radius on Exoplanet Atmospheric Retrievals

Inverse techniques are used to extract information about an exoplanet's atmosphere. These techniques are prone to biased results if the appropriate forward model is not used. One assumption used in a forward model is to assume that the radius of the planet is constant with wavelength, however a more realistic assumption is that the photospheric radius varies with each wavelength. We explore the bias induced when attempting to extract the molecular abundance from an emission spectrum which was generated with a variable radius. We find that for low gravity planets, the retrieval model is not able to fit the data if a constant radius model is used. We find that biased results are obtained when studying a typical hot Jupiter in the MIRI LRS wavelength range. Finally, we show that high gravity planets do not suffer a bias. We recommend that future spectral retrievals that interpret exoplanet emission spectra should take into account a variable radius.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.