Paper detail

Impact of Sound Duration and Inactive Frames on Sound Event Detection Performance

In many methods of sound event detection (SED), a segmented time frame is regarded as one data sample to model training. The durations of sound events greatly depend on the sound event class, e.g., the sound event "fan" has a long duration, whereas the sound event "mouse clicking" is instantaneous. Thus, the difference in the duration between sound event classes results in a serious data imbalance in SED. Moreover, most sound events tend to occur occasionally; therefore, there are many more inactive time frames of sound events than active frames. This also causes a severe data imbalance between active and inactive frames. In this paper, we investigate the impact of sound duration and inactive frames on SED performance by introducing four loss functions, such as simple reweighting loss, inverse frequency loss, asymmetric focal loss, and focal batch Tversky loss. Then, we provide insights into how we tackle this imbalance problem.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.