Paper detail

Impact of satellite glints on the transient science on ZTF scale

Thousands of active artificial objects are orbiting around Earth along with much more non-operational ones -- derelict satellites or rocket bodies, collision debris, or spacecraft payloads, significant part of them being uncatalogued. They all impact observations of the sky by ground-based telescopes by producing a large number of streaks polluting the images, as well as generating false alerts hindering the search for new astrophysical transients. While the former threat for astronomy is widely discussed nowadays in regard of rapidly growing satellite mega-constellations, the latter one -- false transients -- still lacks attention on the similar level. In this work we assess the impact of satellite glints -- rapid flashes produced by reflections of a sunlight from flat surfaces of rotating satellites -- on current and future deep sky surveys such as the ones conducted by the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) and the Vera Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST). For that, we propose a simple routine that detects, in a single exposure, a series of repeated flashes along the trajectories of otherwise invisible satellites, and describe its implementation in FINK alert broker. Application of the routine to ZTF alert stream revealed about 73,000 individual events polluting 3.6\% of all ZTF science images between November 2019 and December 2021 and linked to more than 300 different glinting satellites on all kinds of orbits, from low-Earth up to geostationary ones. The timescales of individual flashes are as short as $0.1$--$10^{-3}$ seconds, with instant brightness of 4--14 magnitudes, peak amplitudes of at least 2--4 magnitudes, and generally complex temporal patterns of flashing activity. We expect LSST to see much more such satellite glints of even larger amplitudes due to its better sensitivity.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.