Paper detail

Impact of COVID-19 on Astronomy: Two Years In

We study the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on astronomy using public records of astronomical publications. We show that COVID-19 has had both positive and negative impacts on research in astronomy. We find that the overall output of the field, measured by the yearly paper count, has increased. This is mainly driven by boosted individual productivity seen across most countries, possibly the result of cultural and technological changes in the scientific community during COVID. However, a decreasing number of incoming new researchers is seen in most of the countries we studied, indicating larger barriers for new researchers to enter the field or for junior researchers to complete their first project during COVID. Unfortunately, the overall improvement in productivity seen in the field is not equally shared by female astronomers. By fraction, fewer papers are written by women and fewer women are among incoming new researchers in most countries. Even though female astronomers also became more productive during COVID, the level of improvement is smaller than for men. Pre-COVID, female astronomers in the Netherlands, Australia, Switzerland were equally as or even more productive than their male colleagues. During COVID, no single country's female astronomers were able to be more productive than their male colleagues on average.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.