Paper detail

Impact of Cosmic Variance on the Galaxy-Halo Connection for Lyman-$α$ Emitters

In this paper we study the impact of cosmic variance and observational uncertainties in constraining the mass and occupation fraction, $f_{\rm occ}$, of dark matter halos hosting Ly-$α$ Emitting Galaxies (LAEs) at high redshift. To this end, we construct mock catalogs from an N-body simulation to match the typical size of observed fields at $z=3.1$ ($\sim 1 {\rm deg^2}$). In our model a dark matter halo with mass in the range $M_{\rm min}<M_{\mathrm h}<M_{\rm max}$ can only host one detectable LAE at most. We proceed to explore the parameter space determined by $M_{\rm min}$,$M_{\rm max}$ and $f_{\rm occ}$ with a Markov Chain Monte-Carlo algorithm using the angular correlation function (ACF) and the LAEs number density as observational constraints. We find that the preferred minimum and maximum masses in our model span a wide range $10^{10.0}h^{-1}{\rm{M_{\odot}}}\leq M_{\rm min} \leq 10^{11.1}h^{-1}{\rm{M_{\odot}}}$ , $10^{11.0}h^{-1}{\rm{M_{\odot}}}\leq M_{\rm max} \leq 10^{13.0}h^{-1}{\rm{M_{\odot}}}$; followed by a wide range in the occupation fraction $0.02\leq f_{\rm occ} \leq 0.30$. As a consequence the median mass, $M_{50}$, of all the consistent models has a large uncertainty $M_{50} = 3.16^{+9.34}_{-2.37}\times 10^{10}$$h^{-1}{\rm{M_{\odot}}}$. However, we find that the same individual models have a relatively tight $1σ$ scatter around the median mass $ΔM_{1σ} = 0.55^{+0.11}_{-0.31}$ dex. We are also able to show that \focc\ is uniquely determined by $M_{\rm min}$, regardless of $M_{\rm max}$. We argue that upcoming large surveys covering at least $25$ deg$^{2}$ should be able to put tighter constraints on $M_{\rm min}$ and $f_{\rm occ}$ through the LAE number density distribution width constructed over several fields of $\sim 1$ deg$^{2}$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.