Paper detail

Impact of Correlation between Nakagami-m Interferers on Coverage Probability and Rate in Cellular Systems

Coverage probability and rate expressions are theoretically compared for the following cases: $(i).$ Both the user channel and the $N$ interferers are independent and non identical Nakagami-m distributed random variables (RVs). $(ii).$ The $N$ interferers are correlated Nakagami-m RVs. It is analytically shown that the coverage probability in the presence of correlated interferers is greater than or equal to the coverage probability in the presence of non-identical independent interferers when the shape parameter of the channel between the user and its base station is not greater than one. It is further analytically shown that the average rate in the presence of correlated interferers is greater than or equal to the average rate in the presence of non-identical independent interferers. Simulation results are provided and these match with the obtained theoretical results. The utility of our results are also discussed.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.