Paper detail

Imaginary geometry II: reversibility of SLE_κ(ρ_1;ρ_2) for κ\in (0,4)

Given a simply connected planar domain D, distinct points x,y \in \partial D, and κ>0, the Schramm-Loewner evolution SLE_κis a random continuous non-self-crossing path in the closure of D from x to y. The SLE_κ(ρ_1;ρ_2) processes, defined for ρ_1, ρ_2 > -2, are in some sense the most natural generalizations of SLE_κ. When κ\leq 4, we prove that the law of the time-reversal of an \SLE_κ(ρ_1;ρ_2) from x to y is, up to parameterization, an SLE_κ(ρ_2;ρ_1) from y to x. This assumes that the "force points" used to define SLE_κ(ρ_1;ρ_2) are immediately to the left and right of the SLE seed. A generalization to arbitrary (and arbitrarily many) force points applies whenever the path does not (or is conditioned not to) hit the boundary of D except at the endpoints. The time-reversal symmetry has a particularly natural interpretation when the paths are coupled with the Gaussian free field and viewed as rays of a random geometry. It allows us to couple two instances of the Gaussian free field (with different boundary conditions) so that their difference is almost surely constant on either side of the path. In a fairly general sense, adding appropriate constants to the two sides of a ray reverses its orientation.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.