Paper detail

Image Aesthetics Prediction Using Multiple Patches Preserving the Original Aspect Ratio of Contents

The spread of social networking services has created an increasing demand for selecting, editing, and generating impressive images. This trend increases the importance of evaluating image aesthetics as a complementary function of automatic image processing. We propose a multi-patch method, named MPA-Net (Multi-Patch Aggregation Network), to predict image aesthetics scores by maintaining the original aspect ratios of contents in the images. Through an experiment involving the large-scale AVA dataset, which contains 250,000 images, we show that the effectiveness of the equal-interval multi-patch selection approach for aesthetics score prediction is significant compared to the single-patch prediction and random patch selection approaches. For this dataset, MPA-Net outperforms the neural image assessment algorithm, which was regarded as a baseline method. In particular, MPA-Net yields a 0.073 (11.5%) higher linear correlation coefficient (LCC) of aesthetics scores and a 0.088 (14.4%) higher Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (SRCC). MPA-Net also reduces the mean square error (MSE) by 0.0115 (4.18%) and achieves results for the LCC and SRCC that are comparable to those of the state-of-the-art continuous aesthetics score prediction methods. Most notably, MPA-Net yields a significant lower MSE especially for images with aspect ratios far from 1.0, indicating that MPA-Net is useful for a wide range of image aspect ratios. MPA-Net uses only images and does not require external information during the training nor prediction stages. Therefore, MPA-Net has great potential for applications aside from aesthetics score prediction such as other human subjectivity prediction.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.