Paper detail

Ill-posedness for the stationary Navier-Stokes equations in critical Besov spaces

This paper presents some progress toward an open question which proposed by Tsurumi (Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 234:2, 2019): whether or not the stationary Navier-Stokes equations in $\R^d$ is well-posed from $\dot{B}_{p, q}^{-2}$ to $\mathbb{P} \dot{B}_{p, q}^{0}$ with $p=d$ and $1 \leq q \leq 2$. In this paper, we prove that for the case $1\leq q<\frac d2$ with $d\geq4$ the stationary Navier-Stokes equations is ill-posed from $\dot{B}_{d, q}^{-2}(\R^d)$ to $\mathbb{P} \dot{B}_{d, q}^{0}(\R^d)$ by showing that a sequence of external forces is constructed to show discontinuity of the solution map at zero. Indeed in such case of $q$, there exists a sequence of external forces which converges to zero in $\dot{B}_{d, q}^{-2}$ and yields a sequence of solutions which does not converge to zero in $\dot{B}_{d, q}^{0}$. In particular, we also prove that the stationary Navier-Stokes equations is well-posed from $\dot{B}_{d, 2}^{-2}(\R^d)$ to $\mathbb{P} \dot{B}_{d, 2}^{0}(\R^d)$ with $d=3,4$. Based on these two cases, we demonstrate that the above open question for the dimension $d\geq4$ has been solved completely.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.