Paper detail

iLibScope: Reliable Third-Party Library Detection for iOS Mobile Apps

Vetting security impacts introduced by third-party libraries in iOS apps requires a reliable library detection technique. Especially when a new vulnerability (or a privacy-invasive behavior) was discovered in a third-party library, there is a practical need to precisely identify the existence of libraries and their versions for iOS apps. However, few studies have been proposed to tackle this problem, and they all suffer from the code duplication problem in different libraries. In this paper, we focus on third-party library detection in iOS apps. Given an app, we aim to identify the integrated libraries and pinpoint their versions (or the version range).To this end, we first conduct an in-depth study on iOS third-party libraries to demystify the code duplication challenge. By doing so, we have two key observations: 1) even though two libraries can share classes, the shared classes cannot be integrated into an app simultaneously without causing a class name conflict; and 2) code duplication between multiple versions of two libraries can vary. Based on these findings, we propose a novel profile-based similarity comparison approach to perform the detection. Specifically, we build a library database consists of original library binaries with distinct versions. After extracting profiles for each library version and the target app, we conduct a similarity comparison to find the best matches. We implemented this approach in iLibScope. We built a benchmark consists of 5,807 apps with 10,495 library integrations and applied our tool to it. Our evaluation shows that iLibScope achieves a recall exceeds 99% and a precision exceeds 97% for library detection. We also applied iLibScope to detect the presence of well-known vulnerable third-party libraries in real-world iOS mobile apps to show the promising usage of our tool. It successfully identified 405 vulnerable library usage from 4,249 apps.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.