Paper detail

IGR J17451--3022: constraints on the nature of the donor star

We constrain the binary parameters of the eclipsing accreting X-ray binary IGR J17451--3022 and the nature of its donor star. The donor mass, its radius, and the system inclination angle are computed based on the system orbital period and eclipse duration recently reported by Bozzo et al.\ (2016). We find that the donor is most likely a main-sequence star with the mass comprised within the range $\sim$(0.5--$0.8){\rm M}_{\odot}$ and the radius of $\sim\! 0.7{\rm R}_{\odot}$. Assuming that the accreting compact object in IGR J17451--3022 is a neutron star, the duration of the nearly total rectangular eclipses yields the inclination angle of the system of $71^\circ\lesssim i\lesssim 76^\circ$, compatible with the presence of dips in this system. We rule out the presence of either brown or white dwarf. However, we find an alternative possibility that the donor star in IGR J17451--3022 could be a partially stripped giant with a very low mass, $\sim\! 0.2{\rm M}_{\odot}$. This case requires a substantial mass loss prior to the formation of the giant-star He core. According to that solution, the radius would be $\sim\! 0.4{\rm R}_{\odot}$, at $i\sim 80^\circ$. We additionally show that the well-known approximate dependence of the giant-star radius exclusively on its core mass breaks down below $\sim\!0.3{\rm M}_{\odot}$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.