Paper detail

Ignition of Deflagration and Detonation Ahead of the Flame due to Radiative Preheating of Suspended Micro Particles

We study a flame propagating in the gaseous combustible mixture with suspended inert particles. The gas is assumed to be transparent for the radiation emitted by the combustion products, while particles absorb and re-emit the radiation. Thermal radiation heats the particles, which in turn transfer the heat to the surrounding gaseous mixture by means of heat conduction, so that the gas temperature lags that of the particles. We consider different scenarios depending on the spatial distribution of the particles, their size and the number density. In the case of uniform distribution of the particles the radiation causes a modest increase of the temperature ahead of the flame and the corresponding increase of the flame velocity. The effects of radiation preheating is stronger for a flame with smaller normal velocity. In the case of non-uniform distribution of the particles, such that the particles number density is smaller just ahead of the flame and increases in the distant region ahead of the flame, the preheating caused by the thermal radiation may trigger additional independent source of ignition. This scenario requires the formation of a temperature gradient with the maximum temperature sufficient for ignition in the region of denser particles cloud ahead of the advancing flame. Depending on the steepness of the temperature gradient formed in the unburned mixture, either deflagration or detonation can be initiated via the Zeldovich's gradient mechanism. The ignition and the resulting combustion regimes depend on the temperature profile which is formed in effect of radiation absorption and gas-dynamic expansion. In the case of coal dust flames propagating through a layered dust cloud the effect of radiation heat transfer can result in the propagation of combustion wave with velocity up to 1000m/s and can be a plausible explanation of the origin of dust explosion in coal mines.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.