Paper detail

Ignition limit and shock-to-detonation transition mode of n-heptane/air mixture in high-speed wedge flows

In this work, oblique detonation of n-heptane/air mixture in high-speed wedge flows is simulated by solving the reactive Euler equations with a two-dimensional (2D) configuration. This is a first attempt to model complicated hydrocarbon fuel ODWs with a detailed chemistry (44 species and 112 reactions). Effects of freestream equivalence ratios and velocities are considered, and the abrupt and smooth transition from oblique shock to detonation are predicted. Ignition limit, ODW characteristics, and predictability of the transition mode are discussed. Firstly, homogeneous constant-volume ignition calculations are performed for both fuel-lean and stoichiometric mixtures. The results show that the ignition delay generally increases with the wedge angle. However, a negative wedge angle dependence is observed, due to the negative temperature coefficient effects. The wedge angle range for successful ignition of n-heptane/air mixtures decreases when the wedge length is reduced. From 2D simulations of stationary ODWs, the initiation length generally decreases with the freestream equivalence ratio, but the transition length exhibits weakly non-monotonic dependence. Smooth ODW typically occurs for lean conditions (equivalence ratio < 0.4). The interactions between shock / compression waves and chemical reaction inside the induction zone are also studied with the chemical explosive mode analysis. Moreover, the predictability of the shock-to-detonation transition mode is explored through quantifying the relation between ignition delay and chemical excitation time. It is demonstrated that the ignition delay (excitation time) increases (decreases) with the freestream equivalence ratio for the three studied oncoming flow velocities. Smaller excitation time corresponds to stronger pressure waves from the ignition location behind OSW.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.