Paper detail

Identity Testing for +-Regular Noncommutative Arithmetic Circuits

An efficient randomized polynomial identity test for noncommutative polynomials given by noncommutative arithmetic circuits remains an open problem. The main bottleneck to applying known techniques is that a noncommutative circuit of size $s$ can compute a polynomial of degree exponential in $s$ with a double-exponential number of nonzero monomials. In this paper, we report some progress by dealing with two natural subcases (both allow for polynomials of exponential degree and a double exponential number of monomials): (1) We consider \emph{$+$-regular} noncommutative circuits: these are homogeneous noncommutative circuits with the additional property that all the $+$-gates are layered, and in each $+$-layer all gates have the same syntactic degree. We give a \emph{white-box} polynomial-time deterministic polynomial identity test for such circuits. Our algorithm combines some new structural results for $+$-regular circuits with known results for noncommutative ABP identity testing [RS05PIT], rank bound of commutative depth three identities [SS13], and equivalence testing problem for words [Loh15, MSU97, Pla94]. (2) Next, we consider $ΣΠ^*Σ$ noncommutative circuits: these are noncommutative circuits with layered $+$-gates such that there are only two layers of $+$-gates. These $+$-layers are the output $+$-gate and linear forms at the bottom layer; between the $+$-layers the circuit could have any number of $\times$ gates. We given an efficient randomized \emph{black-box} identity testing problem for $ΣΠ^*Σ$ circuits. In particular, we show if $f\in F<Z>$ is a nonzero noncommutative polynomial computed by a $ΣΠ^*Σ$ circuit of size $s$, then $f$ cannot be a polynomial identity for the matrix algebra $\mathbb{M}_s(F)$, where the field $F$ is a sufficiently large extension of $F$ depending on the degree of $f$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.