Paper detail

Identifying the Major Sources of Variance in Transaction Latencies: Towards More Predictable Databases

Decades of research have sought to improve transaction processing performance and scalability in database management systems (DBMSs). However, significantly less attention has been dedicated to the predictability of performance: how often individual transactions exhibit execution latency far from the mean? Performance predictability is vital when transaction processing lies on the critical path of a complex enterprise software or an interactive web service, as well as in emerging database-as-a-service markets where customers contract for guaranteed levels of performance. In this paper, we take several steps towards achieving more predictable database systems. First, we propose a profiling framework called VProfiler that, given the source code of a DBMS, is able to identify the dominant sources of variance in transaction latency. VProfiler automatically instruments the DBMS source code to deconstruct the overall variance of transaction latencies into variances and covariances of the execution time of individual functions, which in turn provide insight into the root causes of variance. Second, we use VProfiler to analyze MySQL and Postgres - two of the most popular and complex open-source database systems. Our case studies reveal that the primary causes of variance in MySQL and Postgres are lock scheduling and centralized logging, respectively. Finally, based on VProfiler's findings, we further focus on remedying the performance variance of MySQL by (1) proposing a new lock scheduling algorithm, called Variance-Aware Transaction Scheduling (VATS), (2) enhancing the buffer pool replacement policy, and (3) identifying tuning parameters that can reduce variance significantly. Our experimental results show that our schemes reduce overall transaction latency variance by 37% on average (and up to 64%) without compromising throughput or mean latency.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.