Paper detail

Identifying substructure associations in the Milky Way halo using chemo-kinematic tagging

The Milky Way halo has been built-up over cosmic time through the accretion and dissolution of star clusters and dwarf galaxies as well as through their complex interactions with the Galactic disc. Traces of these accreted structures persist to the present day in the chemical and kinematic properties of stars and their orbits and allow for the disentangling of the accretion history of the Galaxy through observations of Milky Way stars. We utilised 6D phase-space information in combination with [Fe/H] measurements to facilitate a clustering analysis of stars using their kinematics and chemistry simultaneously, a technique known as chemo-kinematic tagging. Using t-distributed stochastic neighbour embedding (t-SNE), we performed dimensionality reduction and identify stars from clusters and streams that are co-localised in the kinematic and chemical parameter space. We included E, Jr, Jz, Lz, r_apo, r_peri, and eccentricity as well as [Fe/H] as input into the algorithm, and used a sample of 5347 stars from 229 individual Milky Way substructures compiled from various sources in the literature. Most notably, we recovered several large-scale structures that have been reported in the literature, including GSE, Thamnos, Sequoia, I'itoi, LMS-1/Wukong, Sagittarius, Kraken/Koala, the splashed disc, and a candidate structure recently found in another work. We find that 44\% of Milky Way globular clusters are consistent with having an accreted origin. We also find that the chemo-dynamic properties of omega cen are consistent with a common accretion with the Thamnos structure. In addition, we identified many stream-progenitor associations, most notably a connection between the Orphan-Chenab stream and the Grus II ultra-faint dwarf galaxy, which supports previous findings that these two objects were brought into the Galaxy in the same accretion event.

preprint2025arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.