Paper detail

Identifying Processes Governing Damage Evolution in Quasi-Static Elasticity Part I -- Analysis

We present a quasi-static elasticity model that accounts for damage evolution based on the ideas of Kachanov 1958 and and Rabotnov 1968. We analyze the resulting strongly nonlinear system of differential equations in view of well-posedness. The specific feature is that the displacements are connected to the damage evolution equation via a Nemytskii- or superposition- operator. The novelty in this work is that we present an inverse problem in a parameter identification setting, in which we are able to identify the shape of this Nemytskii-operator. From the material modelling point of view, the relation of material damage and displacements is modelled by the shape of this operator. We establish the Fréchet-derivative of the forward operator as well as the adjoint of the derivative and characterize both via systems of linear differential equations. We prove ill-posedness of the inverse problem and provide a sufficient condition for the classical nonlinear Landweber method to converge.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.