Paper detail

Identifying mergers using non-parametric morphological classification at high redshifts

We investigate the time evolution of non-parametric morphological quantities and their relationship to major mergers between $4\geq z \geq 2$ in high-resolution cosmological zoom simulations of disk galaxies that implement kinetic wind feedback, $H_2$-based star formation, and minimal ISM pressurisation. We show that the resulting galaxies broadly match basic observed physical properties of $z\sim 2$ objects. We measure the galaxies' concentrations ($C$), asymmetries ($A$), and $Gini$ ($G$) and $M_{20}$ coefficients, and correlate these with major merger events identified from the mass growth history. We find that high values of asymmetry provide the best indicator for identifying major mergers of $>1:4$ mass ratio within our sample, with $Gini$-$M_{20}\,$ merger classification only as effective for face-on systems and much less effective for edge-on or randomly-oriented galaxies. The canonical asymmetry cut of $A\geq0.35$, however, is only able to correctly identify major mergers $\sim 10\%$ of the time, while a higher cut of $A\geq 0.8$ more efficiently picks out mergers at this epoch. We further examine the temporal correlation between morphological statistics and mergers, and show that for randomly-oriented galaxies, half the galaxies with $A\geq0.8$ undergo a merger within $\pm0.2\,{\rm Gyr}$, whereas $Gini$-$M_{20}\,$ identification only identifies about a third correctly. The fraction improves further using $A\geq 1.5$, but about the half the mergers are missed by this stringent cut.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.