Paper detail

Identifying change patterns in software history

Traditional algorithms for detecting differences in source code focus on differences between lines. As such, little can be learned about abstract changes that occur over time within a project. Structural differencing on the program's abstract syntax tree reveals changes at the syntactic level within code, which allows us to further process the differences to understand their meaning. We propose that grouping of changes by some metric of similarity, followed by pattern extraction via antiunification will allow us to identify patterns of change within a software project from the sequence of changes contained within a Version Control System (VCS). Tree similarity metrics such as a tree edit distance can be used to group changes in order to identify groupings that may represent a single class of change (e.g., adding a parameter to a function call). By applying antiunification within each group we are able to generalize from families of concrete changes to patterns of structural change. Studying patterns of change at the structural level, instead of line-by-line, allows us to gain insight into the evolution of software.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.