Paper detail

Identification, Secrecy, Template, and Privacy-Leakage of Biometric Identification System Under Noisy Enrollment

In this study, we investigate fundamental trade-off among identification, secrecy, template, and privacy-leakage rates in biometric identification systems. Ignatenko and Willems (2015) studied this system assuming that the channel in the enrollment process of the system is noiseless and they did not consider the template rate. In the enrollment process, however, it is highly considered that noise occurs when bio-data is scanned. In this paper, we impose a noisy channel in the enrollment process and characterize the capacity region of the rate tuples. The capacity region is proved by a novel technique via two auxiliary random variables, which has never been seen in previous studies. As special cases, the obtained result shows that the characterization reduces to the one given by Ignatenko and Willems (2015) where the enrollment channel is noiseless and there is no constraint on the template rate, and it also coincides with the result derived by Günlü and Kramer (2018) where there is only one individual.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.