Identification of the metric for diagonalizable (anti-)pseudo-Hermitian Hamilton operators represented by two-dimensional matrices

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Abstract

A general strategy is provided to identify the most general metric for diagonalizable pseudo-Hermitian and anti-pseudo-Hermitian Hamilton operators represented by two-dimensional matrices. It is investigated how a permutation of the eigen-values of the Hamilton operator in the process of its diagonalization influences the metric and how this permutation equivalence affects energy eigen-values. We try to understand on one hand, how the metric depends on the normalization of the chosen left and right eigen-basis of the matrix representing the diagonalizable pseudo-Hermitian or anti-pseudo-Hermitian Hamilton operator, on the other hand, whether there has to exist a positive semi-definite metric required to set up a meaningful Quantum Theory even for non-Hermitian Hamilton operators of this type. Using our general strategy we determine the metric with respect to the two elements of the two-dimensional permutation group for various topical examples of matrices representing two-dimensional Hamilton operators found in the literature assuming on one hand pseudo-Hermiticity, on the other hand anti-pseudo-Hermiticity. The (unnecessary) constraint inferred by C. M. Bender and collegues that the C{\cal C}-operator of PT{\cal PT}-symmetric Quantum Theory should be an involution (C2=1{\cal C}^2=1) is shown - in the unbroken phase of PT{\cal PT}-symmetry - to require the Hamilton operator to be symmetric. This inconvenient restriction had been already - with hesitation - noted by M. Znojil and H. B. Geyer in 2006 (arXiv:quant-ph/0607104). A Hamilton operator proposed by T. D. Lee and C. G. Wick is used to outline implications of the formalism to higher dimensional Hamilton operators.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.