Paper detail

Identification of the key parameters in a mathematical model of PAR1-mediated signaling in endothelial cells

Biophysical models are often populated by a large number of input parameters that are difficult to predict or measure experimentally. The validity and robustness of a given model can be evaluated by a sensitivity test to its input parameters. In this study, we performed local (based on a Taylor-like method) and global sensitivity (based on Monte Carlo filtering techniques) analyses of a previously derived PAR1-mediated activation model of endothelial cells. This activation model previously demonstrated that peptide-activated PAR1 has a different receptor/G-protein binding affinity that favors Galpha_q activation over Galpha_12/13 by approximately 800-fold. Interestingly, the present study shows that the parameter regulating the binding rate of activated PAR1 to Galpha_12/13 is indeed important to obtain the expected RhoGTP response. Moreover, we show that the parameters representing the rate of PAR1 deactivation and the rate of PAR1 binding to G_q, are the most important parameters in the system. Finally, we illustrate that the kinetic model considered in this study is robust and we provide complementary insights into the biological meaning and importance of its kinetic parameters.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.