Identification of the brightest Lyα emitters at z=6.6: implications for the evolution of the luminosity function in the re-ionisation era

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Abstract

Using wide field narrow-band surveys, we provide a new measurement of the z=6.6z=6.6 Lyman-αα Emitter (LAE) luminosity function (LF), which constraints the bright end for the first time. We use a combination of archival narrow-band NB921 data in UDS and new NB921 measurements in SA22 and COSMOS/UltraVISTA, all observed with the Subaru telescope, with a total area of ∼5\sim 5 deg2^2. We exclude lower redshift interlopers by using broad-band optical and near-infrared photometry and also exclude three supernovae with data split over multiple epochs. Combining the UDS and COSMOS samples we find no evolution of the bright end of the Lyαα LF between z=5.7z=5.7 and 6.66.6, which is supported by spectroscopic follow-up, and conclude that sources with \emph{Himiko}-like luminosity are not as rare as previously thought, with number densities of ∼1.5×10−5\sim 1.5\times10^{-5} Mpc−3^{-3}. Combined with our wide-field SA22 measurements, our results indicate a non-Schechter-like bright end of the LF at z=6.6z=6.6 and a different evolution of \emph{observed} faint and bright LAEs. This differential evolution is also seen in the spectroscopic follow-up of UV selected galaxies and is now also confirmed for Lyαα emitters, and we argue that it may be an effect of re-ionisation. Using a toy-model, we show that such differential evolution of the LF is expected, since brighter sources are able to ionise their surroundings earlier, such that Lyαα photons are able to escape. Our targets are excellent candidates for detailed follow-up studies and provide the possibility to give a unique view on the earliest stages in the formation of galaxies and re-ionisation process.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.