Paper detail

Identification and spectroscopic characterization of 128 new Herbig stars

We present optical spectroscopy observations of 145 high-mass pre-main sequence candidates from the catalogue of Vioque et al. (2020). From these, we provide evidence for the Herbig nature of 128 sources. This increases the number of known objects of the class by $\sim50\%$. We determine the stellar parameters of these sources using the spectra and Gaia EDR3 data. The new sources are well distributed in mass and age, with 23 sources between $4$-$8$ M$_{\odot}$ and 32 sources above $8$ M$_{\odot}$. Accretion rates are inferred from H$α$ and H$β$ luminosities for 104 of the new Herbigs. These accretion rates, combined with previous similar estimates, allow us to analyze the accretion properties of Herbig stars using the largest sample ever considered. We provide further support to the existence of a break in accretion properties at $\sim3$-$4$ M$_{\odot}$, which was already reported for the previously known Herbig stars. We re-estimate the potential break in accretion properties to be at $3.87^{+0.38}_{-0.96}$ M$_{\odot}$. As observed for the previously known Herbig stars, the sample of new Herbig stars independently suggests intense inner-disk photoevaporation for sources with masses above $\sim7$ M$_{\odot}$. These observations provide robust observational support to the accuracy of the Vioque et al. (2020) catalogue of Herbig candidates.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.