Paper detail

Idealized 2D Cloud-Resolving Simulations for Tidally Locked Habitable Planets

Cloud is critical for planetary climate and habitability, but it is also one of the most challenging parts of studying planets in and beyond the solar system. Here we use a cloud-resolving model (CRM) with high resolution (2 km) in a two-dimensional (2D) configuration to simulate the clouds and circulation on tidally locked aqua-planets. We find that the substellar area is covered by deep convective clouds, the nightside is dominated by low-level clouds, and these two are linked by a global-scale Walker circulation. We further find that a uniform surface warming causes the substellar cloud width to decrease, but a reduction in day-night surface temperature contrast or an increase in longwave radiative cooling rate causes the substellar cloud width to increase. These relationships can be roughly interpreted based on simple thermodynamic theories. Comparing the results between CRM and global 3D general circulation model (GCM), we find that they show qualitatively consistent results, including the Walker circulation, the substellar clouds, and the responses of the substellar ascending area and strength to changes in surface temperature or in its zonal contrast. But, large quantitative differences exist, such as the magnitude of cloud water path, the cloud width, and their responses to external forcings. These results increase our confidence in using GCMs for modeling exoplanetary climates, although large quantitative uncertainties should always exist. Future work is required to use 3D CRM(s) with realistic radiative transfer and with the Coriolis force to examine the clouds and climate of tidally locked planets.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.