Paper detail

Ideal structure of crossed products by endomorphisms via reversible extensions of $C^*$-dynamical systems

We consider an extendible endomorphism $α$ of a $C^*$-algebra $A$. We associate to it a canonical $C^*$-dynamical system $(B,β)$ that extends $(A,α)$ and is `reversible' in the sense that the endomorphism $β$ admits a unique regular transfer operator $β_*$. The theory for $(B,β)$ is analogous to the theory of classic crossed products by automorphisms, and the key idea is to describe the counterparts of classic notions for $(B,β)$ in terms of the initial system $(A,α)$. We apply this idea to study the ideal structure of a non-unital version of the crossed product $C^*(A,α,J)$ introduced recently by the author and A. V. Lebedev. This crossed product depends on the choice of an ideal $J$ in $(\kerα)^\bot$, and if $J=(\kerα)^\bot$ it is a modification of Stacey's crossed product that works well with non-injective $α$'s. We provide descriptions of the lattices of ideals in $C^*(A,α,J)$ consisting of gauge-invariant ideals and ideals generated by their intersection with $A$. We investigate conditions under which these lattices coincide with the set of all ideals in $C^*(A,α,J)$. In particular, we obtain simplicity criteria that besides minimality of the action require either outerness of powers of $α$ or pointwise quasinilpotence of $α$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.