Paper detail

Ideal strengths and bonding properties of PuO2 under tension

We perform a first-principles computational tensile test on PuO$_{2}$ based on density-functional theory within local density approximation (LDA)+\emph{U} formalism to investigate its structural, mechanical, magnetic, and intrinsic bonding properties in the four representative directions: [001], [100], [110], and [111]. The stress-strain relations show that the ideal tensile strengths in the four directions are 81.2, 80.5, 28.3, and 16.8 GPa at strains of 0.36, 0.36, 0.22, and 0.18, respectively. The [001] and [100] directions are prominently stronger than other two directions since that more Pu$-$O bonds participate in the pulling process. Through charge and density of states analysis along the [001] direction, we find that the strong mixed ionic/covalent character of Pu$-$O bond is weakened by tensile strain and PuO$_{2}$ will exhibit an insulator-to-metal transition after tensile stress exceeds about 79 GPa.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.