Paper detail

Ideal spectral emissivity design for extreme radiative cooling

Radiative coolers that can passively cool objects by radiating heat into the outer space have recently received much attention. However, the ultimate limits of their performance as well as their ideal spectral design are still unknown. We present the fundamental lower bound of the temperature of a radiatively cooled object on earth surfaces under general conditions, including non-radiative heat transfer, and the upper bound of the net radiative power density of a radiative cooler as a function of temperature. We derive the ideal spectral emissivities that can realize such bounds and, contrary to common belief, find that the ideal emission window is different from 8 to 13 um and forms disjointed sets of wavelengths, whose width diminishes at lower temperatures. We show that ideal radiative coolers with perfect thermal insulation against conduction and convection have a steady-state temperature of 243.6 K in summer and 180.5 K in winter, much below previously measured values. We also provide the ideal emission window for a single-band emitter and show that this window should be much narrower than that of previous designs if the objective is to build a radiative freezer that can operate in summer. We provide a general guideline for designing spectral emissivity to achieve the maximum temperature drop or the maximum net radiative power density.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.