Paper detail

Ideal scales for weighing the Universe

We investigate the performance of a large class of cosmic microwave background experiments with respect to their ability to measure various cosmological parameters. We pay special attention to the measurement of the total cosmological density, $Ω$. We consider interferometer experiments, all-sky single-dish experiments, and also single-dish experiments with a deep-patch technique. Power spectrum estimates for these experiments are studied, and their induced errors in cosmological parameter estimates evaluated. Given this motivation we find various promising corners in the experiment parameter space surveyed. Low noise all-sky satellite experiments are the expensive option, but they are best suited for dealing with large sets of cosmological parameters. At intermediate noises we find a useful corner in high-resolution deep patch single-dish experiments. Interferometers are limited by sample variance, but provide the best estimates based on the very small angular scales. For all these experiments we present conservative, but still promising estimates of the accuracy of the measurement of $Ω$. In these estimates we consider a variety of possible signals not necessarily in the vicinity of standard cold dark matter.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.