Paper detail

IceCube Non-detection of GRBs: Constraints on the Fireball Properties

The increasingly deep limit on the neutrino emission from gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) with IceCube observations has reached the level that could put useful constraints on the fireball properties. We first present a revised analytic calculation of the neutrino flux, which predicts a flux an order of magnitude lower than that obtained by the IceCube collaboration. For benchmark model parameters (e.g. the bulk Lorentz factor is Γ=10^{2.5}, the observed variability time for long GRBs is t_v=0.01 s and the ratio between the energy in accelerated protons and in radiation is η_p=10 for every burst) in the standard internal shock scenario, the predicted neutrino flux from 215 bursts during the period of the 40-string and 59-string configurations is found to be a factor of ~3 below the IceCube sensitivity. However, if we accept the recently found inherent relation between the bulk Lorentz factor and burst energy, the expected neutrino flux increases significantly and the spectral peak shifts to lower energy. In this case, the non-detection then implies that the baryon loading ratio should be η_p<10 if the variability time of long GRBs is fixed to t_v=0.01 s. Instead, if we relax the standard internal shock scenario but keep to assume η_p=10, the non-detection constrains the dissipation radius to be R>4x10^{12} cm assuming the same dissipation radius for every burst and benchmark parameters for fireballs. We also calculate the diffuse neutrino flux from GRBs for different luminosity functions existing in the literature. The expected flux exceeds the current IceCube limit for some luminosity functions, and thus the non-detection constrains η_p<10 in such cases when the variability time of long GRBs is fixed to t_v=0.01 s.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.