Paper detail

Ice Lines in Circumbinary Protoplanetary Disks

I examine the position of the ice line in circumbinary disks heated by steady mass accretion and stellar irradiation and compare with the critical semi-major axis, interior to which planetary orbits are unstable. There is a critical binary separation, dependent on the binary parameters and disk properties, for which the ice line lies within the critical semi-major axis for a given binary system. For an equal mass binary comprised of 1 M$_{\odot}$ components, this critical separation is $\approx 1.04 $AU, and scales weakly with mass accretion rate and Rosseland mean opacity ($\propto [\dot{M}κ_R]^{2/9}$). Assuming a steady mass accretion rate of $\dot{M} \sim 10^{-8} {\rm M_{\odot} yr^{-1}}$ and a Rosseland mean opacity of $κ_R\sim 1 {\rm cm^2 g^{-1}}$, I show that $\gtrsim 80%$ of all binary systems with total masses $M_{\rm tot} \lesssim 4.0 M_{\odot}$ have ice lines that lie interior to the critical semi-major axis. This suggests that rocky planets should not form in these systems, a prediction which can be tested by looking for planets around binaries with separations larger than the critical separation with \emph{Kepler} (difficult) and with microlensing.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.