Paper detail

IC 3599 did it again: A second outburst of the X-ray transient Seyfert 1.9 Galaxy

We report on the Swift discovery of a second high-amplitude (factor 100) outburst of the Seyfert 1.9 galaxy IC 3599, and discuss implications for outburst scenarios. Swift detected this active galactic nucleus (AGN) again in February 2010 in X-rays at a level of (1.50\plm0.11)$\times 10^{36}$ W (0.2-2.0 keV), which is nearly as luminous as the first outburst detected with ROSAT in 1990. Optical data from the Catalina sky survey show that the optical emission was already bright two years before the Swift X-ray high-state. Our new Swift observations performed between 2013 and 2015 show that IC 3599 is currently again in a very low X-ray flux state. This repeat optical and X-ray outburst, and the long optical duration, suggest that IC 3599 is likely not a tidal disruption event (TDE). Instead, variants of AGN-related variability are explored. The data are consistent with an accretion disk instability around a black hole of mass on the order 10$^6$--10$^7$ M$_{\odot}$; a value estimated using several different methods.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.