Paper detail

I Zw 18 as morphological paradigm for rapidly assembling high-z galaxies

IZw18, ever since regarded as the prototypical blue compact dwarf (BCD) galaxy, is, quite ironically, the most atypical BCD known. This is because its large exponential low-surface brightness envelope is not due to an old stellar host but entirely due to extended nebular emission (ne) (Papaderos et al. 2002; P02). We study IZw18 and IZw18C down to an unprecedently faint surface brightness level using HST ACS data. We argue that the properties of IZw18C can be consistently accounted for by propagating star formation over the past ~100 Myr, in combination with stellar diffusion and the associated radial stellar mass filtering effect (P02). As for IZw18, we find that ne extends out to ~16 stellar scale lengths and provides at least 1/3 of the total optical emission. The case of IZw18 suggests caution in studies of distant galaxies in dominant stages of their evolution, rapidly assembling their stellar mass at high specific star formation rates (SSFRs). It calls attention to the fact that ne is not necessarily cospatial with the underlying ionizing and non-ionizing stellar background, neither has to scale with its surface density. The prodigious energetic output during dominant phases of galaxy evolution may result in large exponential ne envelopes, extending much beyond the still compact stellar component, just like in IZw18. Therefore, the morphological paradigm of IZw18, while probably unique in the nearby Universe, may be ubiquitous among high-SSFR galaxies at high redshift. Using IZw18 as reference, we show that extended ne may introduce substantial observational biases and significantly affect fundamental galaxy relations. Among others, we show that the surface brightness profiles of distant morphological analogs to IZw18 may be barely distinguishable from Sersic profiles with an exponent 2<n<5, thus mimicking the profiles of massive galaxy spheroids. (abridged)

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.