Paper detail

i-MARK: A New Subtraction Division Game

Given two finite sets of integers $S\subseteq\NNN\setminus\{0\}$ and $D\subseteq\NNN\setminus\{0,1\}$,the impartial combinatorial game $\IMARK(S,D)$ is played on a heap of tokens. From a heap of $n$ tokens, each player can moveeither to a heap of $n-s$ tokens for some $s\in S$, or to a heap of $n/d$ tokensfor some $d\in D$ if $d$ divides $n$.Such games can be considered as an integral variant of \MARK-type games, introduced by Elwyn Berlekamp and Joe Buhlerand studied by Aviezri Fraenkel and Alan Guo, for which it is allowed to move from a heap of $n$ tokensto a heap of $\lfloor n/d\rfloor$ tokens for any $d\in D$.Under normal convention, it is observed that the Sprague-Grundy sequence of the game $\IMARK(S,D)$ is aperiodic for any sets $S$ and $D$.However, we prove that, in many cases, this sequence is almost periodic and that the set of winning positions is periodic.Moreover, in all these cases, the Sprague-Grundy value of a heap of $n$ tokens can be computed in time $O(\log n)$.We also prove that, under misère convention, the outcome sequence of these games is purely periodic.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.