Paper detail

Hysteresis and complexity in the zero-temperature mean-field RFIM: the soft-spin version

We study the energy landscape of the soft-spin random field model in the mean-field limit and compute analytically the quenched complexity of the metastable states as a function of their magnetization and energy at a given external magnetic field. The shape of the domain within which the complexity is positive (and the number of typical metastable states grows exponentially with system size) changes with the amount of disorder and becomes non-convex and disconnected at low disorder. As a consequence, phase transitions occur both at equilibrium and out of equilibrium along the saturation hysteresis loop. We focus on the zero complexity curve in the field-magnetization plane and its relationship with the hysteresis loop. We also study the response of the system when the magnetization is externally controlled instead of the magnetic field. The main features of the model that should survive in finite dimensions are discussed.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.