Paper detail

Hypothetical hyperbolic encounters between Venus and proto-Mercury that partially \ stripped away proto-Mercury's mantle

Mercury has an unusually large metal core comprising ~70% of its mass comparing to all other terrestrial planets in the solar system. Giant impacts can remove a significant fraction of the silicate mantle of a chondritic proto-Mercury and form the iron rich present-day Mercury. However, such high-temperature giant impacts seem at odds with the retainment of moderately volatile elements on present-day Mercury (Peplowski et al. 2011). We simulated a series of hyperbolic encounters between proto-Mercury and proto-Venus, which may occur in the chaotic early solar system. Tidal disruption of proto-Mercury always removes part of its silicate mantle while its iron core remains intact. We find, in favourable cases, four close encounters with fast spinning projectiles (resulting from previous encounters) can lead to present-day Mercury iron fraction. More encounters are needed when the spin and orbital angular momentum are not always aligned. These hyperbolic encounters have various outcomes, such as orbital decay, binary planets and change of spin rates. These results suggest the importance of proper treatment of close encounters in N-body simulations of planetary accretion.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.