Paper detail

Hypothesis Testing of Mixture Distributions using Compressed Data

In this paper we revisit the binary hypothesis testing problem with one-sided compression. Specifically we assume that the distribution in the null hypothesis is a mixture distribution of iid components. The distribution under the alternative hypothesis is a mixture of products of either iid distributions or finite order Markov distributions with stationary transition kernels. The problem is studied under the Neyman-Pearson framework in which our main interest is the maximum error exponent of the second type of error. We derive the optimal achievable error exponent and under a further sufficient condition establish the maximum $ε$-achievable error exponent. It is shown that to obtain the latter, the study of the exponentially strong converse is needed. Using a simple code transfer argument we also establish new results for the Wyner-Ahlswede-K{ö}rner problem in which the source distribution is a mixture of iid components.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.