Paper detail

Hypergraph Markov Operators, Eigenvalues and Approximation Algorithms

The celebrated Cheeger's Inequality \cite{am85,a86} establishes a bound on the expansion of a graph via its spectrum. This inequality is central to a rich spectral theory of graphs, based on studying the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the adjacency matrix (and other related matrices) of graphs. It has remained open to define a suitable spectral model for hypergraphs whose spectra can be used to estimate various combinatorial properties of the hypergraph. In this paper we introduce a new hypergraph Laplacian operator (generalizing the Laplacian matrix of graphs)and study its spectra. We prove a Cheeger-type inequality for hypergraphs, relating the second smallest eigenvalue of this operator to the expansion of the hypergraph. We bound other hypergraph expansion parameters via higher eigenvalues of this operator. We give bounds on the diameter of the hypergraph as a function of the second smallest eigenvalue of the Laplacian operator. The Markov process underlying the Laplacian operator can be viewed as a dispersion process on the vertices of the hypergraph that might be of independent interest. We bound the {\em Mixing-time} of this process as a function of the second smallest eigenvalue of the Laplacian operator. All these results are generalizations of the corresponding results for graphs. We show that there can be no linear operator for hypergraphs whose spectra captures hypergraph expansion in a Cheeger-like manner. For any $k$, we give a polynomial time algorithm to compute an approximation to the $k^{th}$ smallest eigenvalue of the operator. We show that this approximation factor is optimal under the SSE hypothesis (introduced by \cite{rs10}) for constant values of $k$. Finally, using the factor preserving reduction from vertex expansion in graphs to hypergraph expansion, we show that all our results for hypergraphs extend to vertex expansion in graphs.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.