Paper detail

Hypergraph $F$-designs for arbitrary $F$

We solve the existence problem for $F$-designs for arbitrary $r$-uniform hypergraphs $F$. In particular, this shows that, given any $r$-uniform hypergraph $F$, the trivially necessary divisibility conditions are sufficient to guarantee a decomposition of any sufficiently large complete $r$-uniform hypergraph $G=K_n^{(r)}$ into edge-disjoint copies of $F$, which answers a question asked e.g. by Keevash. The graph case $r=2$ forms one of the cornerstones of design theory and was proved by Wilson in 1975. The case when $F$ is complete corresponds to the existence of block designs, a problem going back to the 19th century, which was first settled by Keevash. More generally, our results extend to $F$-designs of quasi-random hypergraphs $G$ and of hypergraphs $G$ of suitably large minimum degree. Our approach builds on results and methods we recently introduced in our new proof of the existence conjecture for block designs.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.