Paper detail

Hyperbolic-parabolic singular perturbation for mildly degenerate Kirchhoff equations: decay-error estimates

We consider degenerate Kirchhoff equations with a small parameter epsilon in front of the second-order time-derivative. It is well known that these equations admit global solutions when epsilon is small enough, and that these solutions decay as t -> +infinity with the same rate of solutions of the limit problem (of parabolic type). In this paper we prove decay-error estimates for the difference between a solution of the hyperbolic problem and the solution of the corresponding parabolic problem. These estimates show in the same time that the difference tends to zero both as epsilon -> 0, and as t -> +infinity. Concerning the decay rates, it turns out that the difference decays faster than the two terms separately (as t -> +infinity). Proofs involve a nonlinear step where we separate Fourier components with respect to the lowest frequency, followed by a linear step where we exploit weighted versions of classical energies.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.