Abstract

We compare X-ray and caustic mass profiles for a sample of 16 massive galaxy clusters. We assume hydrostatic equilibrium in interpreting the X-ray data, and use large samples of cluster members with redshifts as a basis for applying the caustic technique. The hydrostatic and caustic masses agree to better than ≈20%\approx20\% on average across the radial range covered by both techniques (∼[0.2−1.25]R500)(\sim[0.2-1.25]R_{500}). The mass profiles were measured independently and do not assume a common functional form. Previous studies suggest that, at R500R_{500}, the hydrostatic and caustic masses are biased low and high respectively. We find that the ratio of hydrostatic to caustic mass at R500R_{500} is 1.20−0.11+0.131.20^{+0.13}_{-0.11}; thus it is larger than 0.9 at ≈3σ\approx3σ and the combination of under- and over-estimation of the mass by these two techniques is ≈10%\approx10\% at most. There is no indication of any dependence of the mass ratio on the X-ray morphology of the clusters, indicating that the hydrostatic masses are not strongly systematically affected by the dynamical state of the clusters. Overall, our results favour a small value of the so-called hydrostatic bias due to non-thermal pressure sources.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.